Skip to main content

All Malaysia Reports (AMR) - Week 43

/
Content updates

Recently added cases from AMR to Westlaw Asia

Dato’ Seri Anwar bin Ibrahim v Tan Sri Dato’ Hj Muhyiddin bin Haji Mohd Yassin (The Prime Minister of Malaysia) & Anor (and 2 Other Appeals) [2023] 7 AMR 533, CA

Administrative law – Remedies – Judicial review – Appeal against – High Court dismissed leave application to challenge validity of Proclamation of Emergency to control and reduce COVID-19 cases issued under Article 150(1) of the Federal Constitution – Whether court clothed with jurisdiction to adjudicate substantive matter raised in application – Whether substantive matters raised justiciable – Whether Parliament intended to exclude judicial review of decisions to proclaim emergency and promulgate emergency laws – Whether court barred from questioning exercise of discretion by Yang di-Pertuan Agong on Proclamation of Emergency – Emergency (Essential Powers) Ordinance 2021, ss 11, 14, 15 – Federal Constitution, Article 150, 150(1), (6), (8) – Rules of Court 2012, Order 53 – Specific Relief Act 1950, s 44

Constitutional law – Proclamation of Emergency – Article 150(6) and (8) of the Federal Constitution – Validity of – Whether unconstitutional – Whether Parliament intended to exclude judicial review of decisions to proclaim emergency and promulgate emergency laws – Whether legislation enacted pursuant to Proclamation of Emergency invalid on ground of inconsistency with the Federal Constitution – Whether court barred from questioning exercise of discretion by Yang di-Pertuan Agong on Proclamation of Emergency – Emergency (Essential Powers) Ordinance 2021, ss 11, 14, 15 – Federal Constitution, Article 150, 150(1), (6), (8) – Rules of Court 2012, Order 53 – Specific Relief Act 1950, s 44

Kedai Pajak Shin Ngien Sdn Bhd v Pendakwa Raya [2023] 7 AMR 549, CA

Contract – Securities – Unredeemed pledges – Pawnbroker convicted under Pawnbrokers Act 1972 ("the Act") for selling unredeemed pledges – Whether selling unredeemed pledges at business premises part of pawnbroking business – Whether word "includes" in s 2 of the Act enlarged meaning of pawnbroking business – Whether amounted to offence under s 16(3) of the Act – Contracts Act 1950, s 129 – Pawnbrokers Act 1972, ss 2, 16(3), 23(1)

Criminal law – Pawnbroking business – Disposal of unredeemed pledges – Appeal against conviction and sentence – Pawnbroker convicted under Pawnbrokers Act 1972 ("the Act") for selling unredeemed pledges – Whether selling unredeemed pledges at business premises part of pawnbroking business – Whether word "includes" in s 2 of the Act enlarged meaning of pawnbroking business – Whether amounted to offence under s 16(3) of the Act – Contracts Act 1950, s 129 – Pawnbrokers Act 1972, ss 2, 16(3), 23(1)

Statutes – Interpretation – Pawnbroking business – Whether selling unredeemed pledges at business premises part of pawnbroking business – Whether word "includes" in s 2 of the Act enlarged meaning of pawnbroking business – Whether amounted to offence under s 16(3) of the Act – Contracts Act 1950, s 129 – Pawnbrokers Act 1972, ss 2, 16(3), 23(1)

Chantika Kelang Beras Sdn Bhd v Padiberas Nasional Berhad [2023] 7 AMR 573, HC

Civil procedure – Action – Limitation – Recovery of outstanding dues – Claim for non-payment for paddy seeds supplied under paddy incentive program – Whether court empowered to decide on preliminary issue – Whether claim time-barred – Limitation Act 1953, Part III – Rules of Court 2012, Order 14A, Order 33 r 5, Order 34 r 1

Contract – Breach – Recovery of outstanding dues – Claim for non-payment for paddy seeds supplied under paddy incentive program – Whether court empowered to decide on preliminary issue – Whether claim time-barred – Limitation Act 1953, Part III – Rules of Court 2012, Order 14A, Order 33 r 5, Order 34 r 1

Lee Sook Cheng v Ng Meng Hai [2023] 7 AMR 579, HC

Family law – Judicial separation – Maintenance – Application to rescind maintenance obligations under court order – Ground of material change of husband's retirement from job raised – Whether court order was obtained by consent – Whether material change existed at time of recording of court order – Whether maintenance order should be rescinded – Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act 1976, s 83

Lembaga Lebuhraya Malaysia v Pentadbir Tanah Daerah Kuala Langat [2023] 7 AMR 586, HC

Land law – Acquisition of land – Compensation – Land Administrator's award for three subject lots acquired on behalf of Lembaga Lebuhraya Malaysia ("LLM") objected by landowner and LLM – Landowner sought an increased compensation for market value of said lots and injurious affection – LLM sought reduction of compensation and setting aside of certain items in award – Whether compensation award ought to be increased or reduced – Whether award for costs tenable in absence of evidence – Whether award ought to be set aside – Land Acquisition Act 1960, First Schedule, paragraph 2(c)

Muhamad Shamsul bin Samsudin v Pendakwa Raya [2023] 7 AMR 601, HC

Criminal procedure – Sentencing – Appeal – Accused pleaded guilty to seven charges under s 376(2)(d) of the Penal Code – Sentence of cumulative imprisonment term of 105 years to run concurrently, resulting in 45 years of imprisonment – Whether sentence ought to be reduced and/or varied in view of alleged crushing effect upon accused – Whether accused first time offender attracting leniency in sentencing – Child Act 2001, s 31(1)(a) – Criminal Procedure Code, ss 292, 316(b)(ii) – Penal Code, s 376(2)(d)

Tiong Wen Long v Livia Yeo Sze Kia (f) [2023] 7 AMR 621, HC

Family law – Children – Access and maintenance – Application to amend/vary decree nisi by husband relating to access and maintenance of children – Children attending classes during husband's access period – Whether there was material change in circumstances to amend or vary decree nisi – Whether in children's best interests and welfare – Whether there was cogent and conclusive evidence on balance of probability to show that husband was bad father to children – Whether maintenance payable by husband ought to be varied/amended – Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act 1976, ss 83, 96

 

By Thomson Reuters Malaysia Editorial Team
Malaysia Editorial Team

Speak to a consultant

Can't find an answer to your question?
Contact our support team.

Request training

Contact our team to arrange training.

Tell us what you think

We'd love to hear what you think
of our products and support.